http://blog.voipsupply.com/cisco-spa8800-first-look Everything you need to know about VoIP Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:54:39 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8 hourly 1 http://blog.voipsupply.com/cisco-spa8800-first-look/comment-page-1#comment-61122 Emad Tue, 20 Oct 2009 01:12:48 +0000 http://blog.voipsupply.com/?p=6932#comment-61122 Has any one configured it in 3cx environment? If yes i might need your help! Thanks in advance. Has any one configured it in 3cx environment? If yes i might need your help!
Thanks in advance.

]]> http://blog.voipsupply.com/cisco-spa8800-first-look/comment-page-1#comment-58382 Nick Onoufriou Tue, 18 Aug 2009 03:47:53 +0000 http://blog.voipsupply.com/?p=6932#comment-58382 I just picked up one of these for testing with Asterisk. The product does not feel like the linksys/sipura products. This has a good solid weight to it. The call quality seems much better than spa3000/3102 for the fxo ports. The fxs ports seem the same though - not that they were bad in the first place. I have found sipura/linksys FXS device to be much better than the grandstreams ata's, internal Digium FXS boards, and even better than the audiocodes FXS gateways. I just picked up one of these for testing with Asterisk. The product does not feel like the linksys/sipura products. This has a good solid weight to it. The call quality seems much better than spa3000/3102 for the fxo ports. The fxs ports seem the same though – not that they were bad in the first place. I have found sipura/linksys FXS device to be much better than the grandstreams ata’s, internal Digium FXS boards, and even better than the audiocodes FXS gateways.

]]> http://blog.voipsupply.com/cisco-spa8800-first-look/comment-page-1#comment-56052 Osama Abu Halaweh Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:34:59 +0000 http://blog.voipsupply.com/?p=6932#comment-56052 How many user can work with SPA8000? How many user can work with SPA8000?

]]> http://blog.voipsupply.com/cisco-spa8800-first-look/comment-page-1#comment-54082 IgorG Tue, 02 Jun 2009 05:21:48 +0000 http://blog.voipsupply.com/?p=6932#comment-54082 More correctly to say that SPA8000 is for _SPA2102_ sticked together in one case because T.38 support More correctly to say that SPA8000 is for _SPA2102_ sticked together in one case because T.38 support

]]> http://blog.voipsupply.com/cisco-spa8800-first-look/comment-page-1#comment-53802 Sean Harlow Mon, 01 Jun 2009 16:34:54 +0000 http://blog.voipsupply.com/?p=6932#comment-53802 Looks good. The SPA8000 was effectively four PAP2s stuffed in one case plus a NAT router that was VoIP aware or at least had the proper ports forwarded, so this looks like the same thing but for the SPA3102. Should be very interesting for converting small key systems, centrex, or simple multi-line installations to IP. Looks good. The SPA8000 was effectively four PAP2s stuffed in one case plus a NAT router that was VoIP aware or at least had the proper ports forwarded, so this looks like the same thing but for the SPA3102. Should be very interesting for converting small key systems, centrex, or simple multi-line installations to IP.

]]>