Comments for VoIP Insider

Comment on Leaked: New MultiLine IP Phone with IAX2 Support by noname

noname — Sun, 05 Jul 2009 01:43:59 +0000

atcom tech support said AT620/AT620P has broadcom BCM1190 chipset inside.

Comment on Digium Releases TCE400B PCI-Express Transcoder Card by Jason Auckland

Jason Auckland — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:44:28 +0000

Any idea on when these will be available for purchase?

Comment on New MP-11X Analog VoIP Gateways from AudioCodes Shipping by Karen Tatintsyan

Karen Tatintsyan — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 07:04:57 +0000

Company Armenian Software Ltd. is a leading financial software development company in Armenia. Currently our company uses Panasonic KX-TDA200 PBX with 16 external lines and 80 internal numbers. Microsoft Office Communications Server 2007 is used for internal communications between users.
Currently we are required to integrate the KX-TDA200 PBX with OCS which will allow the following functionalities:
1. The users, who have analog phones, can accept external and internal calls by using both their phones and Microsoft Office Communicator.
2. The users, who do not have the analog phones (because of PBX limits), can accept the external and internal by using Microsoft Office Communicator.

Could you please suggest us equipment options which will allow the provision of above functionalities.

Comment on Truphone for iPhone Non Review by Garrett Smith

Garrett Smith — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:56:05 +0000

@ rupinder

Your best bet is to contact Truphone support. They can be contacted here: http://www.truphone.com/about_us/contact.html

Comment on Nokia Dumps VoIP (Update) by ridiculous

ridiculous — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 20:31:45 +0000

this is ridiculous. way to go moronokia!

Comment on Sangoma U100 Review by Simon

Simon — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 16:13:36 +0000

If someone managed to port a stable version of asterisk with a basic feature set to the Marvell SheevaPlug, the Sangoma U100 would be the perfect marriage partner for it. Voila, a quickly-deployed, low-cost PBX product for teleworkers and home-based users who run small businesses.

Comment on Truphone for iPhone Non Review by rupinder

rupinder — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:10:50 +0000

I need a 4 digit pin i cant put any in all of them are wrong

Comment on VoIP POTS Emulation on FXO with MagicJack by routermonkey

routermonkey — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:42:19 +0000

Im using the MJ with Cisco CUE/CME. Use CONNECT PLAR where the extention is my autoattendant. Then you can xfer out to other extentions and/or VM. Works ok – only problem might be IOS related, When I send the PLAR to a phone it worked flawless, when I started sending it to AA the FXO is hung for 2 min. after I hang up. If I roll to VM it hangs for longer as the call acts like its on hold.

Not done playing around yet – I think it makes for some fun lab time.

NotoriousBG

Comment on Need an IP PBX? 101104 Alternatives to Cisco and Avaya. by Joe Roper

Joe Roper — Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:29:10 +0000

One of the newest entrants to the Open Source PBX market is FonicaPABX, a freely downloadable CentOS / Asterisk / FreePBX combination, and it’s commercial cousin Foncordiax which is made from the same stuff, but branded to make the sales process easier, and only sold on hardware, only via an experienced dealership network.

http://www.fonicaprojects.com – the open source and freely downloadable version.
http://www.foncordiax.com – The commercial branded version.

Both systems were authored by me, and I also authored the first couple of versions of PBX in a Flash.

Joe Roper

Comment on Head to Head: Trixbox Appliance Versus PhoneBochs Asterisk Appliance by Cory Andrews

Cory Andrews — Sat, 20 Jun 2009 04:45:31 +0000

Christian – thanks for sharing your thoughts. Without splitting hairs on what I agree wholeheartedly is a subjective topic, let me also add that the Trixbox appliance is a good product. I do also acknowledge the comfort level gained for some users in having “one neck to choke”.

My advocacy for PhoneBochs is not without bias, as we (VoIPSupply) have actively resold both products for quite some time. I am simply conveying my opinion, based upon much firsthand experience with both products, that PhoneBochs offers superior hardware and a wider range of configuration options at a similar price point. Hardware defect rates and DOAs with the Trixbox appliance, again in my experience, are well within industry norms. Hardware defect rates and DOAs with PhoneBochs product, based solely upon our experience, are considerably less.

To me, it’s a case of one company almost completely focused on producing awesome hardware, and another company leveraging the bulk of their considerable talent and resources toward making awesome software. It is very difficult to do both.

PhoneBochs, although a very small outfit in terms of headcount, also offers very competent support for both their hardware and Trixbox software.