<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for VoIP Insider</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.voipsupply.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.voipsupply.com</link>
	<description>Everything you need to know about VoIP</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:54:39 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on How to obtain MagicJack SIP Credentials by Cracker Jack</title>
		<link>http://blog.voipsupply.com/how-to-obtain-magicjack-sip-credentials/comment-page-2#comment-63302</link>
		<dc:creator>Cracker Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.voipsupply.com/?p=2572#comment-63302</guid>
		<description>I tired everything, hexedits, magic.zip, pm.exe, every tool out there. All I get is ProxyUserPassword NOT changed; continue ....
I think the password is being encrypted now.
Moving on with my life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tired everything, hexedits, magic.zip, pm.exe, every tool out there. All I get is ProxyUserPassword NOT changed; continue &#8230;.<br />
I think the password is being encrypted now.<br />
Moving on with my life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Setting Up an AudioCodes MP1xx FXS With Asterisk by Vlok Stone</title>
		<link>http://blog.voipsupply.com/setting-up-an-audiocodes-mp1xx-fxs-with-asterisk/comment-page-1#comment-63282</link>
		<dc:creator>Vlok Stone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.voipsupply.com/?p=2362#comment-63282</guid>
		<description>@ patrick try using By Dest Phone Number under hunt groups</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ patrick try using By Dest Phone Number under hunt groups</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Look:  Cisco SPA525G Desktop IP Phone with WiFi, BlueTooth and More! by Peter</title>
		<link>http://blog.voipsupply.com/first-look-cisco-spa-525g-desktop-ip-phone-with-wifi-bluetooth-and-more/comment-page-1#comment-63242</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 06:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.voipsupply.com/?p=5012#comment-63242</guid>
		<description>SPA 525G shines while you are using these features.
1. Any locations where there is a WIFI access.
2. Bluetooth.
3. Citrix or any other softwares it can remotely connect to your desktop.
4. MP3
5. Color display where you can upload your pictures like a digital picture display frame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SPA 525G shines while you are using these features.<br />
1. Any locations where there is a WIFI access.<br />
2. Bluetooth.<br />
3. Citrix or any other softwares it can remotely connect to your desktop.<br />
4. MP3<br />
5. Color display where you can upload your pictures like a digital picture display frame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Look: Panasonic KX-NT700 Wideband IP Conference Phone by DEEPAK</title>
		<link>http://blog.voipsupply.com/first-look-panasonic-kx-nt700-wideband-ip-conference-phone/comment-page-1#comment-63232</link>
		<dc:creator>DEEPAK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 09:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.voipsupply.com/?p=12832#comment-63232</guid>
		<description>pls forward quotation for specker phone Panasonic KX-NT700</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pls forward quotation for specker phone Panasonic KX-NT700</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on First Look: SIPDroid Open Source SIP Client for Android Mobile Phones by Raymond</title>
		<link>http://blog.voipsupply.com/first-look-sipdroid-open-source-sip-client-for-android-mobile-phones/comment-page-1#comment-63212</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 18:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.voipsupply.com/?p=6292#comment-63212</guid>
		<description>Installed latest SIPDroid Beta to my Nexus One ... application looks good... I can receive calls using Google Voice over SIP/Wifi, however making calls linking the SIP/Gizmo5 sound terrible on the Nexus One, however the caller can hear perfectly. I wonder how to correct this issue .... Fring seems to work find for both calling/receiving .... I wonder if its just a simple matter to correct for Gizmo5 clients</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Installed latest SIPDroid Beta to my Nexus One &#8230; application looks good&#8230; I can receive calls using Google Voice over SIP/Wifi, however making calls linking the SIP/Gizmo5 sound terrible on the Nexus One, however the caller can hear perfectly. I wonder how to correct this issue &#8230;. Fring seems to work find for both calling/receiving &#8230;. I wonder if its just a simple matter to correct for Gizmo5 clients</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Setting Up an AudioCodes MP1xx FXS With Asterisk by patrick</title>
		<link>http://blog.voipsupply.com/setting-up-an-audiocodes-mp1xx-fxs-with-asterisk/comment-page-1#comment-63182</link>
		<dc:creator>patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 00:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.voipsupply.com/?p=2362#comment-63182</guid>
		<description>does not work. I can not get the thing to got ext 9000 to port 1 9001 port2. The only way it works is set to ascending and ofcourse that will not work. the docs for this unit sucks. I am sure it will work nicely if I could get it to work right. the whole point of getting this was to have it work with 2 fax machines and two modems. if it is radomly picking ports then it is useless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does not work. I can not get the thing to got ext 9000 to port 1 9001 port2. The only way it works is set to ascending and ofcourse that will not work. the docs for this unit sucks. I am sure it will work nicely if I could get it to work right. the whole point of getting this was to have it work with 2 fax machines and two modems. if it is radomly picking ports then it is useless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Need an IP PBX?  101104 Alternatives to Cisco and Avaya. by Jan</title>
		<link>http://blog.voipsupply.com/need-an-ip-pbx-101-alternatives-to-cisco-and-avaya/comment-page-1#comment-63172</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.voipsupply.com/?p=3002#comment-63172</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the list, Cory

But there is a big hole in the list containing some of the least expensive embedded PBX&#039;s in the world. Atcom Technology Co. Inc. is manufacturing an entire line of PBX&#039;s based on the Blackfin DSP and powered by VoIPtel CE firmware. This firmware is based on uClinux and Astfin2, is actively maintained and has been chosen as the default firmware by Atcom. 

Designed for the corporate user there is VoIPtel SE which comes complete with an inexpensive Service Contract.

For more info please follow these links:
http://voiptel-pro.com
http://voiptel-se.com
http://forum.voiptel.no
http://blog.voiptel.no

Regards

Jan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the list, Cory</p>
<p>But there is a big hole in the list containing some of the least expensive embedded PBX&#8217;s in the world. Atcom Technology Co. Inc. is manufacturing an entire line of PBX&#8217;s based on the Blackfin DSP and powered by VoIPtel CE firmware. This firmware is based on uClinux and Astfin2, is actively maintained and has been chosen as the default firmware by Atcom. </p>
<p>Designed for the corporate user there is VoIPtel SE which comes complete with an inexpensive Service Contract.</p>
<p>For more info please follow these links:<br />
<a href="http://voiptel-pro.com" rel="nofollow">http://voiptel-pro.com</a><br />
<a href="http://voiptel-se.com" rel="nofollow">http://voiptel-se.com</a><br />
<a href="http://forum.voiptel.no" rel="nofollow">http://forum.voiptel.no</a><br />
<a href="http://blog.voiptel.no" rel="nofollow">http://blog.voiptel.no</a></p>
<p>Regards</p>
<p>Jan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DECT vs. Wi-Fi Death Match…Who Will Be Victorious? by Garrett Smith</title>
		<link>http://blog.voipsupply.com/dect-vs-wi-fi-death-match%e2%80%a6who-will-be-victorious/comment-page-1#comment-63142</link>
		<dc:creator>Garrett Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.voipsupply.com/?p=632#comment-63142</guid>
		<description>@ Fletch

I&#039;m not sure either of these technologies are bad for your health. They&#039;ve all been approved for use by the FCC, etc so I&#039;m pretty confident that using either technology will not present a health risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Fletch</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure either of these technologies are bad for your health. They&#8217;ve all been approved for use by the FCC, etc so I&#8217;m pretty confident that using either technology will not present a health risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DECT vs. Wi-Fi Death Match…Who Will Be Victorious? by Fletch</title>
		<link>http://blog.voipsupply.com/dect-vs-wi-fi-death-match%e2%80%a6who-will-be-victorious/comment-page-1#comment-63132</link>
		<dc:creator>Fletch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.voipsupply.com/?p=632#comment-63132</guid>
		<description>Is there a difference in possible health consequences? Currently health consequences are somewhat unknown but is it that one might be less damaging for your health than the other?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a difference in possible health consequences? Currently health consequences are somewhat unknown but is it that one might be less damaging for your health than the other?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on G.722 Wideband Audio Coming to Cisco SMB Phones by Leif Madsen</title>
		<link>http://blog.voipsupply.com/g722-wideband-audio-coming-to-cisco-smb-phones/comment-page-1#comment-63122</link>
		<dc:creator>Leif Madsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 17:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.voipsupply.com/?p=6972#comment-63122</guid>
		<description>I think it depends on how you&#039;re going to use the phone. For example a lot of people use G.722 in the VoIP Users Conference (http://www.vuc.me) every week, and it certainly makes the conference a lot more enjoyable for those using it.

I think the recording is done in a quality that also shows the users using G.722 and those who are still on G.711 or G.729, so for that kind of application, the G.722 will certainly sound a lot better for those people who listen via podcast.

And no, we&#039;re not all going to be moving to VoIP tomorrow, but when it happens, because G.722 will have been around long enough (and devices that have it aren&#039;t really all that much more expensive), it&#039;ll likely be like upgrading your CRT to an LCD screen, but for voice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it depends on how you&#8217;re going to use the phone. For example a lot of people use G.722 in the VoIP Users Conference (<a href="http://www.vuc.me" rel="nofollow">http://www.vuc.me</a>) every week, and it certainly makes the conference a lot more enjoyable for those using it.</p>
<p>I think the recording is done in a quality that also shows the users using G.722 and those who are still on G.711 or G.729, so for that kind of application, the G.722 will certainly sound a lot better for those people who listen via podcast.</p>
<p>And no, we&#8217;re not all going to be moving to VoIP tomorrow, but when it happens, because G.722 will have been around long enough (and devices that have it aren&#8217;t really all that much more expensive), it&#8217;ll likely be like upgrading your CRT to an LCD screen, but for voice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
