<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Polycom IP 335 Released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.voipsupply.com/polycom-ip-335/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.voipsupply.com/polycom-ip-335</link>
	<description>Everything you need to know about VoIP</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:54:39 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Nees</title>
		<link>http://blog.voipsupply.com/polycom-ip-335/comment-page-1#comment-62512</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Nees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 18:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.voipsupply.com/?p=14622#comment-62512</guid>
		<description>Hands down the biggest advantage this IP 335 has over the IP 331 is the RJ-9 headset port.  When you price out a IP 331 and a barrel 2.5mm to RJ-9 adapter it ends up at about the same price as a IP 335.  Plus, those barrel adapters may not offer the same sound quality as just going straight RJ-9.  The other feature differences are nice-to-haves but I think most customers are not going to pay more for them.  On a low end IP Phone customers are looking for very basic features with high quality audio.  In the end, the phone is only as good as the system it is connected to.  The IP 331 has been a big seller to customers of Interactive Intelligence.  We&#039;re predicting a swing to the IP 335 because of the RJ-9 port.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hands down the biggest advantage this IP 335 has over the IP 331 is the RJ-9 headset port.  When you price out a IP 331 and a barrel 2.5mm to RJ-9 adapter it ends up at about the same price as a IP 335.  Plus, those barrel adapters may not offer the same sound quality as just going straight RJ-9.  The other feature differences are nice-to-haves but I think most customers are not going to pay more for them.  On a low end IP Phone customers are looking for very basic features with high quality audio.  In the end, the phone is only as good as the system it is connected to.  The IP 331 has been a big seller to customers of Interactive Intelligence.  We&#8217;re predicting a swing to the IP 335 because of the RJ-9 port.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Cernick</title>
		<link>http://blog.voipsupply.com/polycom-ip-335/comment-page-1#comment-62102</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Cernick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.voipsupply.com/?p=14622#comment-62102</guid>
		<description>Here at Vintalk we recommend Polycom whenever possible.  Anyone familiar with Polycom knows how reliable their phones are and how amazing the sound quality is.  Polycom&#039;s HD Voice, using the G.722 Codec, is second to none.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here at Vintalk we recommend Polycom whenever possible.  Anyone familiar with Polycom knows how reliable their phones are and how amazing the sound quality is.  Polycom&#8217;s HD Voice, using the G.722 Codec, is second to none.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Garcia</title>
		<link>http://blog.voipsupply.com/polycom-ip-335/comment-page-1#comment-61722</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Garcia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.voipsupply.com/?p=14622#comment-61722</guid>
		<description>Garrett, 

I was able to beta test the IP 335 for the past 6 weeks. Read all about it here:

http://www.ichromis.com/blog/?p=1474</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Garrett, </p>
<p>I was able to beta test the IP 335 for the past 6 weeks. Read all about it here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ichromis.com/blog/?p=1474" rel="nofollow">http://www.ichromis.com/blog/?p=1474</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
